Print Send to friend Archive Comment

Gorge one day, fast the next?

The new diet causing a stir in the States

Have our cake and eat it, too? Yes, please!

Eat everything I want, lose weight and live longer? Yes, please!

Fad diets are known for their ridiculous names, their ridiculous restrictions and their propensity to fail miserably. There's the Breatharian diet (based on the belief that humans need neither food nor water — only air — to survive), the age-old grapefruit diet (which, you guessed it, involves eating only grapefruit) and the Shangri-la diet (which promotes appetite suppression by eating only bland foods).

So when I heard about the UpDayDownDay Diet, also known as the alternate-day diet, I figured I'd stumbled on yet another diet with a silly name, unreasonable restrictions and dire health consequences.

The diet, created by New Orleans plastic surgeon James B Johnson, works exactly the way it sounds. That is, one day you eat whatever you want (the 'up' day) and the next, you suppress your kilojoule intake to 20 percent of what it normally is (the 'Down' day).¬

Sounds fairly radical, but according to scientists at the University of Washington, adults who have followed a similar diet for six years have not only lost weight (and kept it off) but also have better elasticity in their hearts. Other US researchers have found that intermittent fasting can slow the brain's ageing process and reduce the risk of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Dr Johnson, who lost 15 kilograms on the diet, created the plan after learning that, on average, animals live 40 percent longer if they're fed 30 to 40 percent less kilojoules. Johnson believed that permanently restricting kilojoules by this amount would be too prohibitive for dieters to stick to regularly. Instead, by only cutting down half the time, Johnson feels that dieters can sustain the plan for longer.

So how does it work? Basically, by restricting kilojoule intake, the body undergoes a mild form of stress. This causes the body to turn on a gene called SIRT1, also known as "the skinny gene". This helps the body shed fat by releasing fat from the cells around our organs.

Sydney dietician Susie Burrell is wary of the UpDayDownDay Diet, saying that it "sounds too good to be true", adding that there is no scientific evidence to confirm that the plan works.

We decided to speak to the man himself, Dr Johnson, to get the skinny on this rather bizarre eating plan.

Do you follow the diet yourself?
I attempt to reduce my intake by 50 percent every other day. I find it difficult to do 20 percent, and the 50 percent level helps me to not gain weight. Ninety percent of us have to be concerned about excess weight and some have to be more vigilant than others. The alternate day diet makes it possible to control your weight without feeling deprived.

This is a fairly radical diet — you must have your fair share of critics. What do you say to them?
Scientists have reacted positively. People who choose to ignore the underlying science and react to the simplified description of the diet with their own prejudice find it strange, especially since they have heard all their lives that one should eat three solid meals a day.

Some people have construed our advice to eat whatever they want to eat as permission to gorge or binge on 'up' days. This is just plain silly. Common sense dictates that overall calorie intake and expenditure determines body weight. Our point is that it is the number of calories consumed rather than the type of food that is important because the low energy intake on the 'down' day turns on the caloric restriction mechanism regardless of the type of calories.

The number of calories on the 'down' day depends on whether you are trying to lose weight (20 percent) or maintain your weight (50 percent) and get health benefits.

How does the diet protect against disease?
It has long been known that reducing calories prolongs lifespan and prevents disease. It has usually been assumed that to get these benefits extreme thinness is required. It is now known that reducing calories for 36 hours, as in the [alternate-day diet], turns on the same genes and we create a shield to protect our cells from damage due to free radicals, a main cause of aging and disease. This occurs by way of activation of a gene called SIRT1 which, in turn, sets in motion other genes which help to prevent unnecessary cell death, repair damage to DNA, reduce inflammation and body fat, and improve brain function all of which promote health.

Is the diet sustainable?
Yes, the whole point of this approach is that from a behavioural standpoint it is much easier to restrict your intake half the time than it is to do all the time, and you can experience dramatic health benefits. There are people, including myself, who have followed it for five years.

Do you find the people are compelled to eat more than normal on 'up' days because they deprive themselves the day before?
In our diet asthma study, hunger was no greater on 'up' days than the base line level before the study started. In fact, virtually everyone reports that they are amazed to find that they are not hungry the day after a 'down' day. However, people do experience hunger on the 'down' day itself.

Are there health risks associated with the diet?
On the contrary, health improves very rapidly on the diet by numerous measures, as we showed in our asthma-diet study. There is every reason to expect it will work in many different disease states.

Plus: Cosmo investigates why we're obsessed with celebrity diets and the celebs who love junk food.

More article
Number of Comments(9) Add Comment
Posted 08 Jun 2008 by saz
i think this diet would be bad for u as ur body would not know what to do and would try and save fat. I went on a diet and lost 45 kg and all i did was eat 4000 kj a day with 30 mins of exercise. doing this diet would put stress on ur body.  Report thisReport this

Posted 09 Jun 2008 by Jeni
It's not 'gorging' & 'fasting'. It's a standard 8700kJ one day, 1700 the next. Cereal, fruit, a sandwich, some nuts, a stirfry with rice one day & an apple, soup & steamed veggies the next. If you 'gorged' & had 13000 then 1700 it would be like having 7350 both days, hardly a change not to mention all the fat & sugar on the 'gorge' day cancelling any good from the slight decrease in overall kJs. The science & investigative analysis backs up the claims, but I doubt many people would follow it as intended.  Report thisReport this

Posted 10 Jun 2008 by chopper
Sounds good in theory ,but as in any diet willpower on the up days would still need to be good, or you would continue to add weight. Also think a lot of people would struggle with the whole concept and feel really guilty after up days.   Report thisReport this

Posted 10 Jun 2008 by Laura
It's hard to imagine that this diet would be sustainable. Seems to me if you're concentrating on fasting one day and eating 'normally' the next you'd pretty much be thinking about food most of the time. Sounds like hard work to me. I'm also sceptical about whether you'd be able to get enough nutrients.  Report thisReport this

Posted 11 Jun 2008 by MJ
This diet would be very hard to stick to, considering if you eat, for example 6 small meals and then having to only eat 3 small meals the next day. The other issue with this diet is that it sends the message that people can eat whatever they like, and this will usually be junk and processed food which has minimimal nutrition. If you eat healthy foods with the right portion in conjunction with exercise- you will achieve weightloss.  Report thisReport this

PREVIOUS PAGE12 NEXT

Poll

Would you watch porn if it was more female-friendly?


Competitions

Cosmo CompetitionsEnter now for your opportunity to WIN one of Cosmopolitan's competitions! more »

Most popular

The world's richest tweens more »
Two of a kind more »
Men and Sex more »
The diva wears Prada more »